This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
935- C.A. No. 5183-2022.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
935 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.5183 OF 2022
IN FAST/8034/2022
THE EX. ENGINEER, BEED IRRIGATION DIV. BEED AND ORS VERSUS KASHINATH S/O MAHADEO KARPE (DIED) LRS DNYANESHWAR AND ANR
Advocate for Applicants : Mr. K. M. Daskhedkar h/f Patil Ruturaj C.
Advocate for respondent Nos. 1 and 2 : Mr. A. V. Thombre
CORAM : S. G. DIGE, J. DATE : 27.09.2022
PER COURT :-
Heard learned counsel for the applicants and learned counsel for respondent No.1 and 2.
( S.G. DIGE,)
JUDGE
ysk
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the delay in filing the appeal of 951 days should be condoned.
THE EX. ENGINEER, BEED IRRIGATION DIV. BEED
KASHINATH S/O MAHADEO KARPE (DIED) LRS
DNYANESHWAR AND ANR
S. G. DIGE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
