High Court dismissed a withdrawn civil revision application but granted liberty to the applicants to raise the issue of maintainability based on Section 27 of the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act.
Application dismissed as withdrawn; liberty granted to raise maintainability issue.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BDP-SPS-TAC
BHARAT DASHARATH PANDIT
Digitally signedby BHARATDASHARATHPANDIT Date: 2022.01.2011:45:03 +0530
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 55 OF 2021
AVINASH ASHOKKUMAR JADHAV
THROUGH POWER OF ATTORNEY
HOLDER AMARJEET PREMSING
TANDALE & ANR.….Applicants
V/s
ASHOKKUMAR LAGMANNA JADHAV…..Respondent
Mr. Yuvraj P. Narvankar for the Applicants.
CORAM: NITIN W. SAMBRE, J.
DATE: JANUARY 19, 2022
P.C.:-
1]On instructions, prayer is made for withdrawal of the
Application.
2]Application is dismissed as withdrawn. However, Applicants are
at liberty to raise an issue of maintainability of the suit in view of
provisions of Section 27 of the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents
and Senior Citizens Act.
(NITIN W. SAMBRE, J. )
1/1
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the civil revision application withdrawing the suit should be dismissed with liberty to raise the issue of maintainability.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Avinash Ashokkumar Jadhav
Amarjeet Premsing Tandale & Anr.
Ashokkumar Lagmannar Jadhav
Nitin W. Sambre
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court