M/S. Shree Ayyappa Constructions through Its Partner v. Smt. Nalini Vidyanand Oak and Ors.

Bombay HC18 Jan 2022WP/1706/2019

Download

Case brief

from the order text

What is this about?

COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL…

A compact analysis

This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.

¶1

(5)-WP-1706-19.doc .

M/S. Shree Ayyappa Constructions through Its… — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Bombay HC (2022)

¶12

3. The contentions of learned counsel for the petitioner Ms.
Gauri Godse are the prayer for amendment of the writ petition is
already pending, so as to effectively argue injunction application, it
is necessary that the application for amendment of written
statement Exh.39 be decided first.

¶19

7. In view of above, application Exh.39 for amendment of
written statement stands allowed. The petitioner/defendant No.10
shall within two weeks deposit cost of Rs.5000/- to which the
respondents/plaintiffs will be entitled to withdraw. After the
deposit of amount of cost, the petitioner will be entitled to carry out
amendment. Counsel for the petitioner submits that cooperation
will be extended in expeditious disposal of the temporary injunction
application moved by the respondents/plaintiffs. In view of above
submissions, it is directed that the application for temporary
injunction moved by the respondents/plaintiffs be decided
expeditiously in any case within eight weeks from the date of the
production of this order before the Court below.

M/S. Shree Ayyappa Constructions through Its Partner v. Smt. Nalini Vidyanand Oak and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

A compact analysis

M/S. Shree Ayyappa Constructions through Its Partner v. Smt. Nalini Vidyanand Oak and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Messrs. Antony Waste Handling Cell Pvt. Ltd. Company Vs Bharat Automotive Proprietory Firm through Bharat Arora

Shri. Subhash Bhikaji Neharkar and Ors. Vs Shri. Shivaji Tukaram Bhor and Ors.

Appasaheb Gangaram Waghmare Decd Thru Lhrs and Ors. Vs Ravikant Parampa Karadage and Ors.

Shanataram Jivan Bhagat Vs Nago Kana Bhagat Decd. Thr. Lhrs Krushna Manglya Bhagat and Ors.

Kunda Sagar Otari Vs Sagar Dhondiram Otari

M/S. Shree Ayyappa Constructions Thr. Partner Shri. Srinivas Guruprasad Valmiki Vs Smt. Nalini Vidyanand Oak and Ors.