The High Court of Bombay listed a writ petition for hearing but proceeded to lift calendar due to counsel's representations, recording no judicial pronouncement on the merits.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
bipin prithiani
1
30-wp-4191.22.doc
Digitally signed IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY by BIPIN DHARMENDER BIPIN PRITHIANI CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION DHARMENDER PRITHIANI Date: 2022.06.28 11:17:08 +0530
WRIT PETITION 4191 OF 2022
Shri Mahendra Jyotiram Bhosale Versus
Sou. Jyoti Pravin Bhosale and Anr.
… Petitioner
… Respondents
Mr. Kirankumar J. Phakade for the Petitioner. Mr. Tukaram Shendge i/by Vaibhav R. Gaikwad for the Respondent 1.
CORAM: ROHIT B. DEO, J. DATE : 27th JUNE, 2022
P.C. :-
. This matter was listed on board on 26th April, 2022 and at the request of the learned counsel for the petitioner was adjourned to 2nd August, 2022.
[ROHIT B. DEO, J.]
Shri Mahendra Jyotiram Bhosale
Sou. Jyoti Pravin Bhosale
ROHIT B. DEO
As recorded by the court registry
8 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
