The single bench of R. D. Dhanka and S. G. Mehare, JJ. dismissed the contempt petition as no order as to costs. The court held that the order dated August 21, 2018 was complied with and found no obligation to take action under the Contempt of Courts Act.
No order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 cp 403.19
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 403 OF 2019 IN
WRIT PETITION NO. 4930 OF 2014
Ajaysing Bhimsing Patil .. Petitioner
Versus
Smt. Pavneet Kaur and another .. Respondents
Ms. Manisha Dalare, Advocate h/f Talekar and Associates, Advocate for the Petitioner.
Ms Ashwini S. Hoge Patil, Advocate for Respondent Nos. 1 and 2.
CORAM : R. D. DHANUKA AND S. G. MEHARE, JJ. DATE : 19TH APRIL, 2022.
FINAL ORDER :
. Matter is on board and is mentioned at 2.30 p.m. by the learned counsel for respondent Nos. 1 and 2.
2 cp 403.19
position.
[S. G. MEHARE, J.] [R. D. DHANUKA, J.]
bsb/April 22
Ajaysing Bhimsing Patil
Smt. Pavneet Kaur
R. D. DHANUKA
S. G. MEHARE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
