Petitioner filed contempt petition for disobedience of Writ Petition order directing Collector to decide representation on land acquisition award. Petitioner withdrew as award was approved by court on 18.04.2022. Contempt petition disposed allowing withdrawal.
Contempt petition disposed of allowing withdrawal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
934-CP.107-20.odt
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
934 CONT. PETITION NO.107 OF 2020
IN WP/12756/2018
KADU BAJIRAO DHUMAL
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
Advocate for Petitioner : Mr. Pathade Vishweshwar H.
AGP for Respondent/s-State : Mr. S. G. Karlekar.
CORAM : R. D. DHANUKA, AND
S. G. MEHARE, JJ.
DATE : 22.04.2022
PER COURT:-
1. By this Contempt Petition, the petitioner seeks action as
per the provisions of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 against
respondent Nos.2 and 3 for the alleged willful disobedience of
the order dated 28.11.2018 passed by this Court in Writ
Petition No.12756 of 2018, directing respondent No.1-the
Collector to decide the representations made by the petitioner,
if already not decided, in accordance with law, as expeditiously
as possible, within three (3) months from the date of the said
order.
2. Learned AGP for respondent No.1-State tenders a copy
2 934-CP.107-20.odt
of the letter dated 18.04.2022 from the Office of the Collector
stating that the award under Section 28-A of the Land
Acquisition Act is already approved by the said order dated
18.04.2022 and further steps would be taken expeditiously.
Copy of the said letter is taken on record. Copy of the same is
served upon the learned counsel for the petitioner.
3. In view of the order dated 18.04.2022, the learned counsel for the petitioner does not press this Contempt Petition. Statement is accepted.
4. Contempt Petition is disposed off in the aforesaid terms.
No order as to costs.
(S. G. MEHARE, J.)
(R. D. DHANUKA, J.)
vmk/-
KADU BAJIRAO DHUMAL
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
R. D. DHANUKA
S. G. MEHARE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court