Plaintiff sought leave to withdraw the suit as parties amicably resolved the dispute. The court granted the withdrawal and disposed of the associated Summons for Judgment.
Leave granted to withdraw the suit; suit and Summons for Judgment disposed as withdrawn; court-fee refund ordered.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
23-SJ30-20INCOMSS133-20.DOC
Santosh
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
IN ITS COMMERCIAL DIVISION
COMM SUMMARY SUIT NO. 133 OF 2020 WITH
SUMMONS FOR JUDGMENT NO. 30 OF 2020
SANTOSH SUBHASH KULKARNI
Digitally signed by SANTOSH SUBHASH KULKARNI Date: 2022.08.17 10:59:14 +0530
Gargi Huttenes – Albertus Pvt. Ltd. ...Plaintiff
Versus
DCM Engineering Product (Unit of DCM Ltd.) …Defendant
Mr. Rajesh Singh, i/b Legal Liacious, for the Plaintiffs. Ms. Shriya Sardal, h/f Dharmendra J. Damani, for the Defendant.
CORAM: N. J. JAMADAR, J. DATED : 11th AUGUST, 2022
PC:-
withdraw the suit, as according to his instructions, the parties have amicably resolved the dispute.
does not survive and stands disposed of.
[N. J. JAMADAR, J.]
1/1
N. J. Jamadar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
