Allowed an interim application seeking substituted service on defendant No. 2. Ordered service by way of publication in two newspapers and listed the suit for hearing on 22 September 2022.
Substituted service on defendant No. 2 by way of publication in Kokan Sakal and Free Press Journal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
42-IA-1791-2022.doc
INTERIM APPLICATION NO.1791 OF 2022 IN
COMMERCIAL ADMIRALTY SUIT NO.10 OF 2020
Shrikishna Singh and Others ...Applicants vs.
Altus Uber and Others ...Defendants
VISHAL SUBHASH PAREKAR
Digitally signed by VISHAL SUBHASH PAREKAR Date: 2022.08.11 10:50:47 +0530
Ms. Anagha Tandel a/w. Ms. Janhavi Khare i/b. Vishwakarma and Associates, for the Plaintiffs.
Mr. Raghvendra Desai i/b. Bose & Mitra & Co., for Defendant No. 1. Mr. Dharmesh Jain i/b. Mr. Anil Aggrawal, for the Defendant No. 3.
CORAM : N. J. JAMADAR, J. DATE : AUGUST 10, 2022
P.C.:
are made out for substituted service. Hence, the application stands allowed in terms of prayer clause (a).
of publication in two news papers namely “Kokan Sakal” (Marathi) and “Free Press Journal” (English).
Vishal Parekar, P.A.
...1
3 issues framed by the court
Whether justifiable grounds exist for substituted service on defendant No. 2.
Whether the mode of substituted service via newspaper publication is appropriate.
Interim Relief in Commercial Admiralty Suit
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Shrikishna Singh and Others
Altus Uber and Others
N. J. JAMADAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
