Allowed

Rajesh Chotelal Bhagat v. the Union of India and Others

Bombay HC18 Feb 2022CA/387/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court allowed six civil applications seeking amendment of memos in writ petitions at the nascent stage to introduce facts regarding the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, dispensing with a formal hearing.

What did the court decide?

Civil applications were allowed in terms of prayer clause "B"; necessary amendment to be carried out within 14 days; applications disposed of.

Rajesh Chotelal Bhagat Vs the Union of India… — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Bombay HC (2022)

¶1

1 ca 385.22

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD

¶3

CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 385 OF 2022 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 4395 OF 2021

¶4

Mohanlal Chotelal Bhagat .. Applicant Versus The Union of India and others .. Respondents

¶5

AND CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 386 OF 2022 IN

¶6

WRIT PETITION NO. 4397 OF 2014

¶7

Kishanlal Chotelal Bhagat .. Applicant Versus The Union of India and others .. Respondents

¶8

AND CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 387 OF 2022 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 4396 OF 2014

¶9

Rajesh Chotelal Bhagat .. Applicant Versus The Union of India and others .. Respondents

¶10

AND CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 388 OF 2022 IN

¶11

WRIT PETITION NO. 4394 OF 2014

¶12

Subhash Chotelal Bhagat Since deceased through L.Rs. Naresh Subhash Bhagat .. Applicant Versus The Union of India and others .. Respondents

¶13

2 ca 385.22

¶14

AND CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 391 OF 2022 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 4107 OF 2014

¶15

Kanhhiyalal Babulal Bhagat Versus The Union of India and others

.. Applicant

.. Respondents

AND

CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 393 OF 2022 IN

¶20

WRIT PETITION NO. 4393 OF 2014

¶21

Motilal Chotelal Bhagat .. Applicant Versus The Union of India and others .. Respondents

¶22

.. Respondents

¶23

AND CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 396 OF 2022 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 4399 OF 2014

¶24

Madanlal Chotelal Bhagat .. Applicant Versus The Union of India and others .. Respondents

¶25

AND CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 397 OF 2022 IN

¶26

WRIT PETITION NO. 4398 OF 2014

¶27

Champaklal Chotelal Bhagat .. Applicant Versus The Union of India and others .. Respondents

¶28

Shri Raviraj R. Chandak, Advocate for the Applicant in all matters.

¶29

Shri A. G. Talhar, A.S.G. for the Respondent No. 1 in all matters. Shri Alok Sharma, Advocate, for Respondent Nos. 2 and 3.

¶30

3 ca 385.22

¶31

CORAM : S. V. GANGAPURWALA AND S. G. DIGE, JJ. DATE : 18TH FEBRUARY, 2022.

¶32

FINAL ORDER :

¶33

. Present civil applications are filed for amendment in memo of the petitions.

¶34

Mr. Chandak, the learned counsel for applicants submits that, subsequent events are sought to be brought on record. The Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme has been floated and other facts are to be placed on record.

¶35

Mr. Sharma, the learned advocate for non applicant Nos. 2 and 3 and Mr. Talhar, the learned A. S. G. for non applicant No. 1 oppose the applications on the ground that the applicants are not concerned with the merits of the writ petitions.

¶36

The writ petitions are not yet admitted. The same are at the nascent stage.

¶37

Even otherwise non applicants will have every opportunity to controvert the averments sought to be introduced by way of amendment.

¶38

For the reasons stated in the application, the civil applications are allowed in terms of prayer clause “B”. The civil applications are disposed of.

¶39

4 ca 385.22

¶40

Necessary amendment be carried out within a period of 14 days from today.

¶41

[S. G. DIGE, J.] [S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J.]

¶42

bsb/Feb.22

Rajesh Chotelal Bhagat v. the Union of India and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rajesh Chotelal Bhagat v. the Union of India and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/S Aditya Construction through Its Partner Suyash Padmakar Patil Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

M/S Aditya Construction through Its Partner Suyash Padmakar Patil Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

M/S Aditya Construction through Its Partner Suyash Padmakar Patil Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Srushti Dhanraj Kore Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Mohanlal Chotelal Bhagat Vs the Union of India and Others

Kishanlal Chotelal Bhagat Vs the Union of India and Others