Disposed

The Staee of Maharashtra and Anr. v. Bajirao Govind Bangar and Ors.

Bombay HC12 Nov 2022CA/2570/2010

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

National Lok Adalat disposed of multiple First Appeals and Civil Applications. Civil applications condoned delay due to amicable settlement. Appeals withdrawn by the State following a Government Resolution and full deposit of awarded amounts by claimants.

What did the court decide?

Condonation of delay allowed; civil applications disposed off; appeals withdrawn and disposed off by the State.

The Staee of Maharashtra and Anr. Vs Bajirao Govind… — Writ and Judicial Review | Bombay HC (2022)

¶1

( 1 ) fa2833.13.

¶2

IN THE NATIONAL LOK ADALAT PRESIDED OVER BY HON’BLE SHRI JUSTICE KISHORE C. SANT, HELD ON 12.11.2022, AT HIGH COURT LEGAL SERVICES SUB-COMMITTEE AT AURANGABAD

¶3

36 FIRST APPEAL NO.2833 OF 2013

¶4

THE STATE OF MAH VERSUS

¶5

LAXMANBUWAS GUIRU KISHANBUWA AND

¶6

37 FIRST APPEAL NO.2871 OF 2013

¶7

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR. VERSUS

¶8

BHIMAO ANANDRAO DHONDE AND ORS. AND

¶9

38 FIRST APPEAL NO.88 OF 2015

¶10

WITH CA/13372/2010 IN FA/87/2015 WITH CA/13370/2010 IN FA/88/2015 WITH FA/87/2015

¶11

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA VERSUS

¶12

JAGANNATH RAMKRISHNA PAWAR AND ANR

¶13

AND

¶14

40 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.2569 OF 2010

¶15

IN FAST/1240/2010 WITH CA/2570/2010 IN FAST/1240/2010

¶16

THE STAEE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

¶17

VERSUS

¶18

BAJIRAO GOVIND BANGAR AND ORS AND

¶19

41 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.2571 OF 2010 IN FAST/1270/2010 WITH CA/2572/2010 IN FAST/1270/2010

¶20

( 2 ) fa2833.13.

¶21

THE STATE OF MAH AND ANR

¶22

VERSUS

¶23

KASHINATH MAHADA BANGAR AND ORS

¶24

AND

¶25

44 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.11806 OF 2010

¶26

IN FAST/20591/2010 WITH CA/11801/2010 IN

¶27

FAST/20647/2010 WITH CA/11808/2010 IN FAST/20643/2010 WITH CA/11802/2010 IN FAST/20646/2010 WITH

¶28

CA/11803/2010 IN FAST/20646/2010 WITH CA/11809/2010 IN FAST/20643/2010 WITH CA/11804/2010 IN FAST/20645/2010 WITH CA/11805/2010 IN FAST/20645/2010 WITH

¶29

CA/11807/2010 IN FAST/20591/2010 WITH CA/11800/2010 IN FAST/20647/2010

¶30

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR VERSUS

¶31

BABURAO GENAJI BANGAR AND ORS

¶32

AND

¶33

45 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.13363 OF 2010

¶34

IN FAST/24291/2010 WITH CA/13366/2010 IN

¶35

FAST/24272/2010 WITH CA/13364/2010 IN FAST/24291/2010 WITH CA/13365/2010 IN FAST/24272/2010

¶36

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

¶37

VERSUS

¶38

RAGHUNATH BHAU HINGE

¶39

Mr. S. R. Yadav, AGP for the appellants

¶40

Mr. D. R. Jaybhar, Advocate for the respondents in respective matters.

¶41

O R D E R

¶42

(12^th NOVEMBER, 2022)

¶43

Civil Application for condonation of delay:-

¶44

Having regard to the reasons mentioned in the application

¶45

and as the parties are arrived at amicable settlement, it is desirable to condone the delay, the delay stands condoned. The civil applications for condonation of delay in respective matters, stand disposed off. Office to register the appeals.

¶46

Appeals-

¶47

These appeals are placed before us in today’s National LokAdalat. Mr. P. S. Mengshetti, Dy. Collector, Latur & Mr. Vishwas Shirsath, SLAO, Ambajogai, Dist. Beed are present.

¶48

Mr. Yadav, learned AGP submits that above numbered group of appeals is squarely covered by Government Resolution No. Sankirna2014/pra.kra4/Bham-1/A-4 dated 03-11-2016 with Government Corrigendum dated 23-02-2017 and 13-08-2018 to the said Government Resolution. Hence, the group of appeals can be withdrawn as per the policy decision taken by the Government of Maharashtra. Accordingly, the State is withdrawing these appeals.

¶49

The learned AGP states that entire amount in these appeals has been deposited and later-on the said amount has been withdrawn by the original claimants by obtaining orders from this court. He submits that in these circumstances nothing survived in these appeals.

¶50

However, before disposing off the appeals, it is further

¶51

( 4 ) fa2833.13.

¶52

clarified that in case the amount is not deposited as per the award, the State Government undertakes to deposit the said amount within a period of one year in the concerned Reference Court. If the amount is not withdrawn by the claimants/respondents, same is allowed to be withdrawn and office to allow withdrawal. If the said amount is not deposited, they are at liberty to withdraw the same after the amount is deposited.

¶53

The first appeals stand disposed off as withdrawn.

¶54

No order as to costs.

¶55

The court fee refund certificate be issued as per the provisions under the of Maharashtra Court Fees Act, 1959.

¶56

In view of withdrawal of these appeals, pending civil applications, if any stand disposed off.

¶57

[ A. R. BORULKAR ] [ S. G. SHETE ] [ KISHORE C. SANT, J. ] Advocate DJ (Retd.) Head of Panel Member Member

¶58

VishalK/fa2833.13.

The Staee of Maharashtra and Anr. v. Bajirao Govind Bangar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

The Staee of Maharashtra and Anr. v. Bajirao Govind Bangar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rambhau S/O Nathoba Magar vs State of Maharashtra Thr Collector, Jalna and Ors.

Gayabai Damodar Magar vs State of Maharashtra Thr Collector, Jalna and Ors.

State of Mam. Vs Ratnamala Gopalrao

Gangamani W/O Sham Potdar and Ors. Vs Ananda Umaji Makapalle and Anr.

The State of Mah and Anr. Vs Sakharam Devrao Garad

The State of Maharashtra and Anr. Vs Chandrakant Kashinath Mirche