Allowed

State of Mam. v. Ratnamala Gopalrao

Bombay HC13 Aug 2022FA/1075/2007

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

First Appeals arising from land acquisition proceedings, where claimants sought compensation, were disposed of as withdrawn during a National Lok Adalat. The court permitted withdrawal of deposited compensation amounts and directed the government to deposit pending amounts within six months to facilitate settlement.

What did the court decide?

Appeals disposed of as withdrawn upon acceptance of withdrawal of claims or deposit of compensation with interest. Pending Civil Applications also disposed of.

State of Mam. Vs Ratnamala Gopalrao — Land Acquisition | Bombay HC (2022)

¶1

I36To40State-FA-Nanded

¶2

IN THE NATIONAL LOK ADALAT PRESIDED OVER BY HON’BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE HELD ON 13TH AUGUST, 2022.

¶3

AT THE HIGH COURT LEGAL SERVICES SUB-COMMITTEE, AURANGABAD

¶4

36 FIRST APPEAL NO.1110 OF 2002

¶5

WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 4937/1997 IN FIRST APPEAL NO. 1110/2002

¶6

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THRO. COLLECTOR.

¶7

VERSUS

¶8

MOHAMMAD JAFAR ABDUL RAHMAN.

¶9

WITH

¶10

37 FIRST APPEAL NO.859 OF 2003

¶11

WITH
FIRST APPEAL NO. 860/2003

¶12

WITH

¶13

FIRST APPEAL NO. 861/2003

¶14

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THRO.COLLECTOR and ANOTHER.

¶15

VERSUS

¶16

PRABHAKAR SHAMRAO.

¶17

WITH

¶18

38 FIRST APPEAL NO.1073 OF 2007

¶19

WITH
FIRST APPEAL NO. 1074/2007
 WITH
FIRST APPEAL NO. 1075/2007

¶20

STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

¶21

VERSUS

¶22

GAJANAN GUNARAO AND OTHERS
WITH

¶23

39 FIRST APPEAL NO.2289 OF 2008

¶24

STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR COLLECTOR NANDED and ORS

¶25

VERSUS

¶26

SHAMRAO MAHADJI KADAM and ORS

¶27

WITH
40 FIRST APPEAL NO.2291 OF 2008

¶28

STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR COLLECTOR NANDED and ORS

¶29

VERSUS

¶30

SHRIRAM GAKOJI DHAGE and ORS

¶31

Mr A. M. Phule, AGP for Appellant-State
Mr. Brijesh Patil, Sub Divisional Officer, Hadgaon,

¶32

Page 1 of 3

¶33

I36To40State-FA-Nanded

¶34

Mr. H.I. Shaikh, Sub Divisional Officer, Majalgaon Sub Division No.50- Acquiring
Body.

¶35

Mr. Prabhudeo Govind Dhule, Deputy Collector, Aurangabad.

¶36

Mr. Amol S. Gandhi, Mr. S.S. Thombre, Mrs. Lata Bade, Mr. G.N. Chincholkar, Mr. M.
V. Deshpande, Mr. G.R. Ingole, Advocates for the respective claimants

¶37

O R D E R

¶38

All these appeals are placed before this Lok-Adalat by the Appellant-State.

¶39

Mr. A. M. Phule, learned AGP for the appellant-State submitted that all

¶40

these appeals are covered by the Government Resolution No. Sankirna-
2014/pra.kra.4/Bham-1/A/4 dated 3rd November, 2016 with Government
Corrigendum dated 23rd February, 2017 and 13th August 2018 to the said
Government Resolution. Thus, these appeals can be withdrawn as per the policy
decision taken by the Government of Maharashtra.

¶41

3. The learned AGP for the appellant-State submitted that in some of the
appeals, entire compensation amount has been deposited and in some appeals, the
amount is yet to be deposited.

¶42

4. Under the circumstances, if the claimants have not withdrawn the amount
in the appeals wherein it is deposited, then they are permitted to withdraw the same
along-with accrued interest thereon till date. In case of appeals wherein the
compensation amounts are not yet deposited, the amount shall be deposited within
a period of six months along-with accrued interest as awarded by the Reference
Court and the respondents/claimants are at liberty to withdraw the same.

¶43

5. Accordingly, all these appeals stand disposed of as withdrawn. No order as
to costs.

¶44

Page 2 of 3

¶45

I36To40State-FA-Nanded

¶46

6. Pending Civil Applications also stand disposed of.

¶47

7. The Court fee refund certificate be issued as per Rules.

¶48

(R. M. DESHMUKH) (S. G. SHETE ) (SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE,J.) Advocate District Judge Head of the Panel Member (Retd.) Member

¶49

Date: 13.08.2022

¶50

Place: Aurangabad

¶51

JPC

¶52

Page 3 of 3

State of Mam. v. Ratnamala Gopalrao

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

State of Mam. v. Ratnamala Gopalrao

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

The State of Maharashtra Vs Mahadeo Kalyan Taware and Anr.

Badamrao S/O. Eknathrao Thote Vs Abasaheb S/O. Vishwasrao Chavan and Anr.

The State of Maharashtra and Another Vs Udhav Haribhau Panchal and Others

Shabbirkhan Ayubhkhan Pathan Thr His Next Friend Brother Najrkha Ayubkha Pathan Vs Rakesh Kautik Thakre and Ors.

The State of Maharashtra Thros.Collector and Another Vs Balwantrao Narayanrao Mhaske.

State of Maha Vs Shaikh Turab Shaikh Chand