Partly allowed

Laxman Aba Gaikwad (Died) Thr Lrs Gangadhar and Ors. v. the Administrator, City and Industrial Dev. Co. of Maharashtra (Cidco), Aurangabad and Others

Bombay HC5 Apr 2022CA/1509/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court partly allowed CA No.1509/2022 by modifying the paragraph regarding the release of deposited amounts. It allowed CA No.1510/2022 to bring legal heirs of deceased Kakasaheb Piraji Thombre on record within two weeks.

What did the court decide?

Paragraph 7 of the earlier order was modified on deposit allocation; legal heirs of deceased Kakasaheb to be brought on record in two weeks.

Laxman Aba Gaikwad (Died) Thr Lrs Gangadhar and Ors… — Writ and Judicial Review | Bombay HC (2022)

¶1

1509.22ca etc

¶2

(1)

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD

¶4

911 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1509 OF 2022 IN CA/4627/2020 IN FA/3569/2019

¶5

LAXMAN ABA GAIKWAD (DIED), THR. LRS GANGADHAR AND ORS.

¶6

VERSUS

¶7

THE ADMINISTRATOR, CITY AND INDUSTRIAL DEV. CO. OF MAHARASHTRA (CIDCO), AURANGABAD AND OTHERS

¶8

Ms S. P. Kakade, Advocate for applicants; Mr A. S. Bajaj, Advocate for respondent No.1 Mr S. G. Sangle, A.G.P. for respondent No.2

¶9

Mr Tarbez Uddin Quadri, Advocate for respondent Nos.4-2-ii to 4-2-4

¶10

WITH

¶11

CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1510 OF 2022 IN CA/11716/2019 IN FA/3569/2019

¶12

PRAYAGBAI DEVRAO GAIKWAD VERSUS

¶13

LAXMAN ABA GAIKWAD (DIED), THR. LRS GANGADHAR AND ORS.

¶14

Mr R. B. Singare, Advocate for applicants Ms. S. P. Kakade, Advocate for respondent Nos.1 to 5 Mr S. G. Sangle, A.G.P. for respondent No.6 Mr A. S. Bajaj, Advocate for respondent No.7

¶15

CORAM : RAVINDRA V. GHUGE AND

¶16

S. G. DIGE, JJ.

¶17

DATE : 5th April, 2022

¶18

PER COURT:

¶19

We have heard the learned Advocates for the respective

¶20

1509.22ca etc (2)

¶21

sides and perused the order passed by this Court, dated 19/03/2021 in Civil Application No.4627/2020.

¶22

Considering the averments and the submissions of the learned Advocates and the order of this Court [Coram : B. R. Gavai (as his Lordship then was) and N. D. Deshpande, JJ.], dated 08/10/2009, this civil application is partly allowed.

¶23

Paragraph 7 of the order dated 19/03/2021 shall now read as under :-

¶24

We direct that,

¶25

(a) 25% of the deposited amount of Rs.3,62,87,337.00, be retained in the Registry of this Court and to be invested in Fixed Deposit Receipts with any Nationalized Bank, initially for a period of 3 years, and to be renewed thereafter from time to time, till the first appeal is decided.

¶26

(b) 50% can be withdrawn, on furnishing personal affidavit undertakings through an Advocate, stating therein that, if the claimants are found to have received excess amount after the first appeal is decided, the excess amount shall be redeposited in this Court within 8 weeks, failing which, the said amount shall carry interest @ 3% p.a. from

¶27

1509.22ca etc

¶28

(3)

¶29

the date of withdrawal.

¶30

¶31

CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1510/2022

¶32

By this application, the applicant desires to bring the legal heirs of deceased Kakasaheb Piraji Thombre, on record. The learned Advocate, who earlier appeared for the deceased Kakasaheb, submits that he can appear for the legal heirs. The legal heirs of deceased Atmaram are already brought on record.

¶33

In view of the above, this civil application is allowed.

¶34

The legal heirs of deceased Kakasaheb, be brought on record within a period of two weeks.

¶35

The learned Advocate causes an appearance on behalf of the legal heirs .

¶36

(S. G. DIGE, J.) (RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J.)

¶37

sjk

Laxman Aba Gaikwad (Died) Thr Lrs Gangadhar and Ors. v. the Administrator, City and Industrial Dev. Co. of Maharashtra (Cidco), Aurangabad and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Laxman Aba Gaikwad (Died) Thr Lrs Gangadhar and Ors. v. the Administrator, City and Industrial Dev. Co. of Maharashtra (Cidco), Aurangabad and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shantaram Tulshiram Wagh Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Manasi Vikram Bhagwat and Others Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Rameshwar Tukaram Sonawane Vs the Secretary Social Justice and Empowerment Dept and Others

Santosh Balwantrao Ghorpade Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Asha Annasaheb Khalkar Vs the State of Maharashtra Thr Its Secretary and Others

Vijayendra Gulabsing Jadhav Vs the State of Maharashtra Thr the Secretary and Others