Dharmendra Pralhad Rao v. the State of Maharashtra
Case brief
What is this about?
The court disposed of the bail application as infructuous because the applicant had already undergone punishment following conviction.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1/1
43.BA.885.2020.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
BAIL APPLICATION NO. 885 OF 2020
Dharmendra Pralhad Rao .... Applicant v/s. The State of Maharashtra .... Respondent
Mr. Ketan Dhavle a/w. Mr. Ketan Dhavle appointed by Court for the Applicant.
Ms. S. S. Kaushik, APP for the respondent-State.
CORAM : NITIN W. SAMBRE, J.
DATED : 14th SEPTEMBER, 2022
P.C.:
the applicant that the applicant has already undergone punishment after he was convicted.
infructuous.
paid admissible fees from the Legal Aid Services Authority.
ANANTKRISHNANAIK Digitally signedby ANANTKRISHNA NAIKDate: 2022.09.1514:38:20 +0530
(NITIN W. SAMBRE, J.)
1/1
akn
Dharmendra Pralhad Rao
The State of Maharashtra
NITIN W. SAMBRE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court