: This bail application moved by a convicted applicant under the POCSO Act was held not maintainable as the remedy lay elsewhere. The application was disposed of.
: The bail application and the interim bail application were disposed of as not maintainable.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1/2
42.BA.884.2020.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
BAIL APPLICATION NO. 884 OF 2020 WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 1200 OF 2020 IN BAIL APPLICATION NO. 884 OF 2020
Gajanan Gokul Sonawane v/s.
The State of Maharashtra
.... Applicant
.... Respondent
Mr. Ketan Dhavle a/w. Adv. Vilasini Balasubramanian appointed by Court for the Applicant.
Mr. A. A. Palkar, APP for the respondent-state.
CORAM : NITIN W. SAMBRE, J.
DATED : 14th SEPTEMBER, 2022
P.C.:
convicted for the offense punishable u/s 363(1), 366 & 363 of the
POCSO Act.
1/2
akn
2/2
42.BA.884.2020.doc
paid admissible fees from the Legal Aid Services Authority.
appointed by this Court to give appropriate advise regarding remedy available to the applicant.
ANANT Digitally signed byANANT KRISHNA KRISHNA NAIK Date: 2022.09.15 NAIK 14:39:28 +0530
(NITIN W. SAMBRE, J.)
2/2
akn
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the bail application maintained after applicant convicted under POCSO Act.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Gajanan Gokul Sonawane
The State of Maharashtra
Nitin W. Sambre
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
