In bail application no. 61 of 2022, the applicant withdrew the application before the High Court at Aurangabad upon the court expressing disinclination to grant relief.
Application disposed of as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
( 1 ) 16 ba 61.22
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
16 BAIL APPLICATION NO.61 OF 2022
MAROTI KAMAJI MUDHOL
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Ghanekar Nilesh S.
APP for Respondents/State : Mr. A.V. Deshmukh
CORAM : M.G. SEWLIKAR, J.
DATE :4th April, 2022
P.C.:-
Heard learned counsel Shri Ghanekar for some time. When this
Court expressed its disinclination to grant relief to the applicant, learned
counsel Shri Ghanekar on instructions seeks leave to withdraw the
application. Application is, therefore, disposed of as withdrawn.
[M.G. SEWLIKAR, J.]
mub
MAROTI KAMAJI MUDHOL
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
M.G. SEWLIKAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court