Allowed

Jalindar Keshav Dangat and Others v. the State of Maharashtra

Bombay HC1 Apr 2022BA/287/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In this bail application, the High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad considered the case of three brothers accused of violent property disputes and instigation to kill. The court permitted bail after noting simple injuries to victims and the substantial completion of investigation.

What did the court decide?

Applicants released on PR Bond of Rs. 20,000 each with one solvent surety on conditions.

Jalindar Keshav Dangat and Others Vs the State of… — Cheating and Forgery | Bombay HC (2022)

¶1

¶2

ba287.22.odt

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD

¶4

BAIL APPLICATION NO. 287 OF 2022

¶5

Jalindar S/o Keshav Dangat

¶6

Pradip S/o Jalindar Dangat

¶7

Satish S/o Jalindar Dangat Applicants

¶8

Versus

¶9

The State of Maharashtra

¶10

Respondent

¶11

Mr. N. B. Narwade, Advocate for the applicants. Mr. S. B. Narwade, APP for respondent/State.

¶12

CORAM : M.G. Sewlikar, J.

¶13

DATE : 1^st APRIL, 2022.

¶14

PER COURT :

¶15

Heard.

¶16

Allegations against the applicants in the First Information Report are that on account of property disputes, on 31^st January, 2022 at 1.40 pm, in informant’s feld bearing gut No. 45/3, accused Sudhir Ashok Dangat and Ashok Keshav Dangat abused the informant, fell him down and beat him with kicks and fst blows. Applicant Jalindar Dangat instigated to kill the informant. Accused

¶17

ba287.22.odt

¶18

Sudhir Dangat started the tractor and drove it on the informant. The informant saved himself by jumping out of the way of the tractor. Informant and his mother by the name of Chandrabhaga were assaulted by applicant Jalindar Dangat, Sudhir Dangat, Latabai Dangat, Janabai Dangat, Rohini Dangat and Ashiwni Dangat. Applicant Pradeep Dangat delivered a blow of iron rod on the head of the mother of the informant. Both of them were rescued by the witnesses. On these allegations, First Information Report came to be lodged against the applicants.

¶19

Learned counsel for the applicants submits that all the witnesses including the informant sustained simple injuries. He submits that the entire investigation is complete.

¶20

4. Learned APP opposes the application.

¶21

Perused the investigation papers. From the perusal of the investigation papers it reveals that the medical certifcate of the informant is collected which shows that the informant sustained simple injuries. Apart from the informant, there are two more injured persons viz. Chandrabhaga and Sahebrao. Both of them

¶22

¶23

ba287.22.odt

¶24

sustained simple injuries. Learned APP Shri Narwade submits that the tractor is yet to be seized. So far as the other aspects are concerned, the investigation seems to have been substantially completed. Therefore, I do not fnd any reason to deny bail to the applicants. No extra ordinary circumstance is brought on record to reject bail to the applicants. Applicants have no criminal antecedents. They are not likely to fee from justice. In this view of the matter, I am inclined to release the applicants on bail. Hence the following order :-

¶25

ORDER

¶26

i) Application is allowed.

¶27

ii) Each of the applicants be released on PR Bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rs. Twenty Thousand) with one solvent surety in the like amount in connection with Crime No. 0084/2022 registered at Rahuri Police Station, Dist. Ahmednagar, for the offences punishable under Sections 143, 147, 148, 149, 324, 323, 504, 506, 307 of the Indian Penal Code, on condition that they shall not interfere in the investigation, shall not pressurise the witnesses and shall remain present before the concerned Investigating Offcer on every Wednesday between

¶28

ba287.22.odt

¶29

¶30

12.00 noon and 4.00 pm till fling of the chargesheet.

¶31

Iii) Application stands disposed of.

¶32

iv) It is clarifed that the observations made in the above order are restricted to the decision of this application only and the trial Court shall not get infuenced by the same and can come to its independent conclusion during trial.

¶33

( M. G. SEWLIKAR ) Judge

¶34

dyb

Jalindar Keshav Dangat and Others v. the State of Maharashtra

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Jalindar Keshav Dangat and Others v. the State of Maharashtra

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mahesh Ramkisan Dhotre and Others Vs the State of Maharashtra

Kishor Baraku Patil Vs the State of Maharashtra

Maharudra Machidnra Sangle Vs the State of Maharashtra

Kishor Changdev Dandwate Vs the State of Maharashtra

Mamta D/O. Bhausaheb Jadhav and Others Vs the State of Maharashtra

Ramankumar Darshankumar Vs the State of Maharashtra