The High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad granted leave to the applicant to withdraw the bail application. Consequently, the bail application was dismissed as withdrawn without any substantive adjudication on the merits.
Leave granted to withdraw the bail application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
927 BAIL APPLICATION NO.1697 OF 2022
BHAUSAHEB CHANDRAKANT NIKAM
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
Advocate for Applicants : Mr. Jadhav Satej S.
APP for Respondent-State : Ms. V. S. Choudhari.
CORAM : S. G. MEHARE, J.
DATE :17.11.2022
PER COURT:-
1. Learned counsel for the applicant could not satisfy the
Court the change-in-circumstances, after rejection of the
previous bail application. Hence, the Court expressed
disinclination to grant bail. Learned counsel for the applicant,
on instructions, seeks leave to withdraw the bail application.
2. Leave granted.
3. Bail application stands dismissed as withdrawn.
(S. G. MEHARE, J.)
vmk/-
1 issue framed by the court
Whether leave to withdraw the bail application should be granted.
BHAUSAHEB CHANDRAKANT NIKAM
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
S. G. MEHARE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court