In a matrimonial dispute via criminal revision applications, both parties' counsel admitted the matter was settled mutually. The High Court declared the applications infructuous and disposed of them.
All applications disposed of as infructuous following mutual settlement.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
933-CrRn-86-17.odt
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.86 OF 2017 WITH APPLN/634/2019 IN REVN/86/2017 WITH REVN/120/2017
VAISHALI W/O RAKESH JAISWAL AND ANOTHER VERSUS
RAKESH S/O DHULCHAND JAISWAL
Advocate for Applicants : Mr. Rupesh A. Jaiswal h/f. Mr. N. S. Ghanekar Advocate for Respondent : Mr. M. L. Sangit
CORAM : S. G. MEHARE, J.
DATE : 16-11-2022
PER COURT :-
( S. G. MEHARE ) JUDGE
rrd
Vaishali W/O Rakesh Jaiswal and Another
Rakesh S/O Dhulchand Jaiswal
S. G. Mehare
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
