The High Court dismissed the bail application for want of prosecution as neither the applicant nor any representative appeared before the court for the hearing.
Dismissed for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
(32)BA-143-2021.doc
rkmore
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION BAIL APPLICATION NO.143 OF 2021
| Israfil Samad Sikhdar | ] .. |
Applicant |
|---|---|---|
| vs. | ||
| State of Maharashtra | ] .. |
Respondent |
None for the Applicant. Smt.A.A. Takalkar, APP for State.
PSI B.T. Auty, HC P.A Diwate, Thane City Crime Branch present. Smt.Anamika Malhotra, APP for State.
CORAM : BHARATI DANGRE, J
DATE : 4TH AUGUST, 2022.
P.C.
Digitally signed by RAJSHREE RAJSHREE KISHOR KISHOR MORE MORE Date: 2022.08.06 10:09:21 +0530
[BHARATI DANGRE, J]
1/1
Israfil Samad Sikhdar
State of Maharashtra
Bharati Dangre
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
