Bail application dismissed for want of prosecution as the applicant was not represented on either the previous hearing date or the day of disposal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
(30)BA-140-2021.doc
rkmore
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
BAIL APPLICATION NO.140 OF 2021
Kailash Santosh Veer ] .. Applicant vs. State of Maharashtra & Ors. ] .. Respondents
None for the Applicant.
Smt.A.A. Takalkar, APP for State.
CORAM : BHARATI DANGRE, J
DATE : 4TH AUGUST, 2022.
P.C.
1] On the last date of hearing i.e. on 07.07.2022 none represented the applicant. Today also no one is present to represent him.
Digitally signed by RAJSHREE RAJSHREE KISHOR KISHOR MORE MORE Date: 2022.08.06 10:09:19 +0530
2] Hence, Bail Application is dismissed for want of prosecution.
[BHARATI DANGRE, J]
1/1
Kailash Santosh Veer
State of Maharashtra
Bharati Dangre
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
