and criminal proceedings of R.C.C. No.121 of 2017. After the disinclination was shown by this Court to grant any relief to present petitioners who were the applicants No.1 to 3 before the Division Bench of this Court ; they sought withdrawal of the application and accordingly the said application stood withdrawn against them. It came to be allowed against co-accused who were the married sisters-in-law. Under such circumstances, when even the entire proceeding was sought to be quashed before the Division Bench by the present petitioners and they got that application withdrawn against them when disinclination was shown, the question is whether again almost on the same material they can approach either Judicial Magistrate First Class or revisional authority, or even this Court. The exercise that was to be undertaken by the Hon’ble Division Bench of this Court at the time of considering that application was same, that means the material along with the charge-sheet. No doubt there is a stage under Section 239 of Cr.P.C. where either the Court may think that the charge would be groundless taking into consideration the material on record or it is so pointed out by the accused, then the Court may discharge the accused persons. The question is then the same material is then required to be considered. Therefore, merely because there is such a stage, there was no fresh cause of
