The applicant requested to withdraw the criminal application after the Court showed disinclination to grant relief. The High Court accepted the request and disposed of the application as withdrawn.
Application disposed of as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
929 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1440 OF 2022
MANDAKINI MALHARRAO MIRGE
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER
Mr. C.V. Dharurkar, Advocate for applicant
Mr. S.D. Ghayal, APP for respondent No.1
CORAM :SMT. VIBHA KANKANWADI AND
RAJESH S. PATIL, JJ.
DATE :24th NOVEMBER, 2022
PER COURT:
1After showing disinclination by the Court to grant any relief in
favour of the applicant, learned Advocate for the applicant, on instructions,
submitted that he may be allowed to withdraw the application. Hence, the
application stands disposed of as withdrawn.
( Rajesh S. Patil, J. )
( Smt. Vibha Kankanwadi, J. )
agd
Mandakini Malharrao Mirge
The State of Maharashtra
Another
Vibha Kankanwadi
Rajesh S. Patil
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court