This single-paragraph order disposed of a criminal application as infructuous. The respondents informed that the applicants were not named in the chargesheet, leading to the immediate conclusion of the proceedings.
The criminal application was disposed of as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
937 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1064 OF 2022
ASHOK BABURAO TIDKE AND ANOTHER VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER
Advocate for Applicants : Ms.Amita D. Chate APP for Respondent No.1 : Mr.S.J.Salgare Advocate for Respondent No.2 : Mr. V.D. Gunale
CORAM : MANGESH S. PATIL & ABHAY S. WAGHWASE, JJ. Dated: November 11, 2022
...
PER COURT :-
. Learned APP for respondent No.1, on instructions obtained from the Investigating Ofcer, submits that while fling chargesheet the names of the applicants have not been roped in as accused.
( ABHAY S. WAGHWASE, J. ) ( MANGESH S. PATIL, J. )
SPT
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the criminal application stands disposed of after the respondents submitted that the applicants are not named in the chargesheet.
ASHOK BABURAO TIDKE AND ANOTHER
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER
MANGESH S. PATIL
ABHAY S. WAGHWASE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
