Dismissed

Raju Ismail Beg v. the State of Maharashtra

Bombay HC21 Jul 2022APL/99/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This was a criminal application for bail cancellation under Section 437/439(4) CrPC where the applicant sought revision against the order cancelling bail granted to him in case registered for offences under IPC 403, 406, 418, 420, 467, 468. The High Court dismissed the application as no interference was called for given the applicant's alleged absconding.

What did the court decide?

Application for cancellation of bail rejection set aside and bail cancellation order remains in force.

Raju Ismail Beg Vs the State of Maharashtra — Bail and Remand | Bombay HC (2022)

¶1

 16-APL-99-2021.odt

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

¶3

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶4

CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 99 OF 2021

¶5

Raju Ismail Beg…Applicant

¶6

Versus
The State of Maharashtra …Respondent

¶7

None for the Applicant.
Mr. Y.Y. Dabke, APP for the State.

¶8

CORAM : N.R. BORKAR, J.
DATED : 21 JULY 2022

¶9

P.C. :-

¶10

.The Applicant is accused in Crime No.319 of 2017 registered
with Rajarampuri Police Station, Kolhapur for the offence punishable
under Sections 403, 406, 418, 420, 467, 468 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶11

2.The learned Judicial Magistrate (First Class), Kolhapur by
order dated 10 October 2019 granted bail in the aforesaid crime. The
application was thereafter made for cancellation of bail by the State and
the learned Magistrate by order dated 4 December 2019 cancelled the
bail of the present Applicant. The learned Additional Sessions Judge
rejected the Revision Petition filed by the present Applicant against the
order of cancellation of bail by order dated 25 November 2020.

¶12

3.The learned APP on instructions submits that the Applicant/
accused is absconding. Considering facts and circumstances, no

¶13

Kanchan P Dhuri

¶14

 1 / 2

¶15

 16-APL-99-2021.odt

¶16

interference is called for in the impugned orders. The Application is
dismissed.

¶17

( N.R. BORKAR, J. )

¶18

Digitally signed by KANCHAN KANCHAN PRASHANT DHURI PRASHANT Date: DHURI 2022.07.21 17:11:31 +0530

¶19

Kanchan P Dhuri

¶20

 2 / 2

Raju Ismail Beg v. the State of Maharashtra

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Raju Ismail Beg v. the State of Maharashtra

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Harpreet Singh Anand and Anr. Vs Rajiv Raman Gangwani and Anr.

Ram Das Maneklal Gandhi Vs the Reserve Bank of India and Anr.

Parvej Rafiq Shikalgar Vs Shri. Murud Madatali Patel and Anr.

Anil Premchand Agarwal Vs the State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Jai Pratap Maniar and Anr. Vs Arvind Laxmidas Kapadia and Anr.

Jai Pratap Maniar and Anr. Vs Arvind Laxmidas Kapadia and Anr.