This court refused to exercise extraordinary jurisdiction to quash an FIR filed in 2009, citing a gross delay of 13 years and the fact that the trial was already underway. The application was disposed of without deciding the merits.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
skn 1 32-APL-76.2022.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 76 OF 2022
… Dayalal Shamji Patel and others. Applicants. V/s. The State of Maharashtra and another. … Respondents.
Mr.Rupesh R. Lanjekar i/b. A.K.Dubey for the Applicants. Mr.J.P.Yagnik, APP for the Respondent- State.
Digitally signed by SANJAY SANJAY KASHINATH KASHINATH NANOSKAR NANOSKAR Date: 2022.08.20 15:20:37 +0530
CORAM : NITIN JAMDAR AND N.R. BORKAR, JJ. DATE : 18 August 2022.
P.C. :
Heard the learned counsel for the parties.
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the extraordinary jurisdiction should be exercised to quash the FIR despite a gross delay of 13 years and the trial being underway.
Dayalal Shamji Patel and others
The State of Maharashtra and another
Nitin Jamdar
N.R. Borkar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
