The High Court of Judicature at Bombay, in Criminal Writ Petition No. 1033 of 2021, disposed of the matter after the petitioner's counsel confirmed that the charge was framed and the trial had commenced, keeping all contentions open for the trial.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
7-WP-1033-2021.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 1033 OF 2021
Suryakant Anand Mulik … Petitioner
Versus
The State of Maharashtra and another … Respondents
Mr. Kayval Shah for the Petitioner. Mr. J.P. Yagnik, APP for the State.
Mr. Akshay Dunde instructed by Expert Jurist LLP for Respondent No.2.
CORAM : NITIN JAMDAR AND N.R. BORKAR, JJ.
DATED : 17 AUGUST 2022
P.C. :-
The matter was kept today for the learned Counsel for the Petitioner to take instructions. The learned Counsel for the Petitioner confirms that charge is already framed and trial is commenced. He states that all contentions made by the parties be kept open to be agitated in the trial. Accordingly, keeping all contentions open, the Writ Petition is disposed of.
( N.R. BORKAR, J. ) ( NITIN JAMDAR, J. )
Digitally signed KANCHAN by KANCHAN PRASHANT PRASHANT DHURI DHURI Date: 2022.08.18 14:33:55 +0530
Kanchan P Dhuri
1 / 1
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to dispose of the writ petition once it is confirmed that the trial has commenced and charge is framed.
Suryakant Anand Mulik
The State of Maharashtra
Nitin Jamdar
N.R. Borkar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
