Applicants sought withdrawal of Criminal Appeal No.366 of 2022. The single judge accepted the request and allowed withdrawal, disposing of the application.
Permission to withdraw the application is granted; application allowed to be withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
rpa 1/1 24apl366of2022.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.366 OF 2022
HRDS India and Anr. .. Applicants Versus Kaivalya Enterprises and Ors. .. Respondents
Vachan Bodke i/b. M/s. V.M. Legal, Advocate for the Applicant.
Mr.Sachin Daga a/w. Ms.Sanika Kurundwadkar, Advocate for Respondent No.1.
Mr.Arfan Sait, APP for the Respondent – State.
CORAM : PRAKASH D. NAIK J.
DATED : JUNE 15, 2022.
P.C. :
After the arguments of both the sides were heard and
when the Court was not inclined to grant relief, learned counsel for
the applicants seeks permission to withdraw this application. In view
of the submission, the application is allowed to be withdrawn and
Digitally signed by RAJESHRI RAJESHRI PRAKASH PRAKASH AHER AHER Date: 2022.06.17 11:44:19 +0530
stands disposed of accordingly.
(PRAKASH D. NAIK, J.)
HRDS India and Anr.
Kaivalya Enterprises and Ors.
Prakash D. Naik
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
