In this criminal appeal against anticipated arrest in proceedings under IPC 295-A and IT Act 67, the Court held that since the police report found no evidence of the appellant's involvement, the appeal stands disposed of and no arrest question arises.
The criminal appeal was disposed of; no arrest warrant issued.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
(11)-APEAL-761-2021.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 761 OF 2021
Abdul Rahim Abdul Gani Ghadiyali …Appellant Versus The State Of Maharashtra and Anr. ...Respondents
Ms. Tahera Abdul R. Qureshi, Advocate for the Appellant Mr. A.D. Kamkhedkar, APP for the Respondent – State. Mr. Samrat Chavan, API, Mumbra Police Station.
CORAM : PRAKASH D. NAIK, J. DATE : 14th June, 2022.
PER COURT:
did not reveal the involvement of the appellant in the crime. He tendered report dated 2nd December, 2021, which mentions that no evidence could be gathered against the appellant for posting controversial message on social media. The report is taken on record and marked as Exhibit-X.
1 of 2
Sunny Thote
(11)-APEAL-761-2021.doc
(PRAKASH D. NAIK, J.)
2 of 2
Sunny Thote
1 issue framed by the court
Whether warrant for arrest should issue when investigation reveals no evidence against the appellant.
3 provisions across 3 enactments
Abdul Rahim Abdul Gani Ghadiyali
The State Of Maharashtra
Prakash D. Naik
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
