In a criminal writ petition regarding a closure report, the court was informed that it was no longer necessary to keep the petition pending as further remedies were open to the parties.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
39-WP-872-2021.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 872 OF 2021
Trupti Santosh Shinde w/o.
Dr. Santosh Shinde and another
… Petitioners
Versus
The State of Maharashtra and others … Respondents
Mr. Anand Pandey instructed by Mr. Ramesh Tripathi and Associates for the Petitioners.
Mr. K.V. Saste, APP for the State. Mr. S.M. Oak instructed by Mr. Sagar Anant Joshi for Respondent No.3.
PSI Sanjay Surve, Chunabhatti Police Station, present.
CORAM : NITIN JAMDAR AND N.R. BORKAR, JJ. DATED : 4 JULY 2022
P.C. :-
. The learned APP states that on 10 May 2021 closure report (c-summary) is filed. In light of the development, it is not necessary to keep the Petition pending. As depending on the further steps taken pursuant to the closure report, parties will have their remedies open. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of.
( N.R. BORKAR, J. )
( NITIN JAMDAR, J. )
Kanchan P Dhuri
1 / 1
Trupti Santosh Shinde w/o. Dr. Santosh Shinde and another
The State of Maharashtra
Nitin Jamdar
N.R. Borkar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
