The criminal application was disposed of as withdrawn, following the filing of a praecipe by the applicant's counsel, who stated instructions were received to apply for discharge instead.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
JPP
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 250 OF 2022
Pawan Kumar Ruia
… Applicant
V/s.
The State of Maharashtra and Anr.
... Respondents
Mr. Zalak Mody i/b. A & P Partners for the Applicant Mr. J.P. Yagnik, APP for the Respondent – State
CORAM : NITIN JAMDAR & N.R. BORKAR, JJ.
DATE : 10 AUGUST 2022
P.C. :-
The learned Counsel for the Applicant states that instructions have been received to withdraw the Application as the Applicant intends to apply for discharge. A praecipe to that effect is filed and the Application is listed under the caption “For Withdrawal”. The Application is disposed of as withdrawn as above.
N.R. BORKAR, J.
NITIN JAMDAR, J.
Digitally signed JYOTIPRAKASH by JYOTIPRAKASHPAWAR PAWAR Date: 2022.08.11 15:12:55 +0530
Pawan Kumar Ruia
The State of Maharashtra
Nitin Jamdar
N.R. Borkar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
