In a criminal application challenging an impugned order, the High Court at Nagpur dismissed the plea, holding that the applicant cannot be treated as an adjudicator requiring sanction u/s 197 CrPC.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
15.apl.182.2022.odt
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR.
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 182 OF 2022
Siddharth S/o. Shivnath Ramteke
.vs.
The State of Maharashtra and Anr.
Office notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders.
Court's or Judge's Orders.
Mr S. S. Ramteke, Applicant in person
Mr S. S. Doifode, APP for the respondent No.1
Mr A.P. Thakare, Advocate for respondent No.2
CORAM : SUNIL B. SHUKRE AND G. A. SANAP, JJ . DATED : 29.06.2022
Heard the applicant, the learned APP for respondent No.1 and learned counsel for respondent No.2.
2] Considering the nature of allegations made against this applicant, who cannot be prima faice considered to be an adjudicator, requiring previous sanction under Section 197 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, we are not inclined to entertain this application.
The application stands dismissed.
(G. A. SANAP, J.) (SUNIL B. SHUKRE, J.)
Namrata Signed By:NAMRATA YOGESH DHARKAR P. A. High Court Nagpur Signing Date:30.06.2022 10:36
Siddharth S/o. Shivnath Ramteke
The State of Maharashtra
Sunil B. Shukre
G. A. Sanap
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
