applicant had filed an application for deletion of name of the Purushottam Gawande. Accordingly, the notices were issued to the legal heirs of Purushottam Gawande. Accordingly, informant approached the applicant and made inquiry about the business of wine shop. The applicant disclosed about the same and showed all necessary documents available with him. Thereupon the informant demanded exorbitant amount. The applicant politely refused the request made by the informant. It is contended that the informant filed an application in the office of Collector, Akola on 26/04/2019. The Collector, Akola passed an order of suspension of liquor license and sealed the shop till further orders. The said order was challenged by the applicant before the appellate authority namely Commissioner, State Excise, Mumbai bearing appeal FLR No. 192021/167. The appellate authority passed an order and revoked the order of suspension of license. The appellate authority also directed applicant to keep aside a share of 50% of legal heirs of Purushottam Gawande in profit of the shop. The appellate authority also directed both the parties to settle the dispute as early as possible. But in the third week of November 2021, the informant met the applicant at Akola and reminded him about the operative part of the order of Commissioner of Excise, Mumbai. He again demanded share to the extent of 60% which the applicant has denied. Therefore the informant threatened the applicant that he would rope him in the offence. Accordingly, he filed First Information Report, wherein he alleged that the applicant has forged the documents and continued with the liquor license without giving any information to the family of Purushottam
