The High Court dismissed the criminal application (Cr.ABA No.40/2022) as infructuous because the applicant had already been arrested in the same crime.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR
CRIMINAL APPLICATION (ABA) NO.40/2022
Pravin S/o. Mahadevrao Sarode Vs. The State of Maharashtra
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders
Mr. P. R. Agrawal, Advocate for the Applicant.
Mr. M. J. Khan, A.P.P. for the Non-applicant/State.
CORAM : SURENDRA P. TAVADE, J.
DATE : 01/02/2022.
. Hearing was conducted through video conferencing and the learned counsel agreed that the audio and video quality was proper.
(SURENDRA P. TAVADE, J.)
RGurnule
Digitally signed byRANJANA MANOJ MANDADE Signing Date:01.02.2022 17:53
Pravin S/o. Mahadevrao Sarode
SURENDRA P. TAVADE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
