High Court at Bombay Criminal Appellate Jurisdiction allowed withdrawal of two anticipatory bail applications on February 2, 2022. The court granted permission for their unconditional withdrawal without adjudicating the merits of the applications.
Permission granted for unconditional withdrawal of both anticipatory bail applications.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
11-aba-3-22 & 3028-21(f)
1 / 2
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 03 OF 2022
Abbas Nasrunnah Shaikh.... Applicant
Versus
The State of Maharashtra & Anr..... Respondents
WITH ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 3028 OF 2021
Abdul Gani Nizamuddin Shaikh.... Applicant
Versus
The State of Maharashtra & Anr..... Respondents
Mr. Meghashyam K. Kocharekar for Applicants in both ABAs.
Mr. Pradeep Havnur a/w. S. S. Kharat for Respondent No.2 in both
ABAs.
Smt. A. A. Takalkar, APP for State/Respondent No.1.
CORAM: SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.
DATE: 2nd FEBRUARY 2022
(through Video Conferencing)
P.C. :
1.After arguing for some time, when I expressed my
disinclination to grant relief in these applications, learned counsel
for the applicants prays for unconditional withdrawal of these
applications.
Digitally signed by VINOD VINOD BHASKAR BHASKAR GOKHALE GOKHALE Date: 2022.02.02 16:19:09 +0530
Gokhale
2 / 2 11-aba-3-22 & 3028-21(f)
2. Permission is granted. Both the applications are
allowed to be withdrawn unconditionally and are disposed of as
such.
(SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.)
Abbas Nasrunnah Shaikh
Abdul Gani Nizamuddin Shaikh
The State of Maharashtra
SARANG V. KOTWAL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court