Partly allowed

Naishad Subodhchandra Parikh and Anr. v. the State of Maharashtra

Bombay HC1 Feb 2022ABA/194/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Judicature at Bombay disposed of an anticipatory bail application. The application for the first applicant was withdrawn and allowed. For the second applicant, bail was granted upon arrest in a specific criminal revision with conditions to attend police station and cooperate.

What did the court decide?

Application of Applicant No.1 withdrawn and disposed; Applicant No.2 directed to be released on bail of Rs. 30,000 on furnishing P.R. bond if arrested.

Naishad Subodhchandra Parikh and Anr. Vs the State of… — Anticipatory Bail | Bombay HC (2022)

¶1

12-aba-194-22(f)

¶2

1 / 2

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶4

ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 194 OF 2022

¶5

1. Mr. Naishad Subodhchandra Parikh
2. Smt. Seena Naishad Parikh.... Applicants
 Versus
The State of Maharashtra.... Respondent
______

¶6

Mr. Kuldeep S. Patil i/b. Ms. Heena Suvarnkar for Applicants.
Ms. Rutuja Ambekar, APP for State/Respondent.

¶7

CORAM: SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.
DATE: 1st FEBRUARY 2022
(through Video Conferencing)

¶8

P.C. :

¶9

1.At the outset, learned APP makes a statement that the

¶10

investigating agency does not intend to arrest the applicant No.2 in

¶11

this case. It would be sufficient if she attends the police station as

¶12

and when called and co-operates with the investigation.

¶13

2.Learned counsel for the applicants argued the case for

¶14

the applicant No.1 for some time. However, when I expressed my
disinclination to grant relief to the applicant No.1, learned counsel

¶15

Digitally signed by VINOD VINOD BHASKAR BHASKAR GOKHALE GOKHALE Date: 2022.02.02 10:54:38 +0530

¶16

for the applicants prays for unconditional withdrawal of this

¶17

Gokhale

¶18

2 / 212-aba-194-22(f)

¶19

application on behalf of the applicant No.1. Permission is granted.

¶20

3.Considering this situation, following order is passed:

¶21

ORDER

¶22

(i)In the event of arrest of the Applicant No.2 in
connection with C.R.No. I 290 of 2019 registered
with Vasai Police station, the applicant No.2 is
directed to be released on bail on her furnishing
P. R. bond in the sum of Rs.30,000/- (Rupees
Thirty Thousand Only) with one or two sureties
in the like amount.

¶23

(ii) The Applicant No.2 shall attend the concerned Police Station as and when called and shall cooperate with the investigation.

¶24

(iii)The application on behalf of the applicant No.1
is allowed to be withdrawn unconditionally and
is disposed of as such.

¶25

(SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.)

Naishad Subodhchandra Parikh and Anr. v. the State of Maharashtra

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Naishad Subodhchandra Parikh and Anr. v. the State of Maharashtra

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mayur Trimbak Yashwante Vs the State of Maharashtra

Rohit @ Ankur Bhagwandas Verma Vs the State of Maharashtra

Hari Om @ Arjun Bhavar Singh Rao Vs State of Maharashtra

Mahendran Illogovan @ Appu Harijan Vs the State of Maharashtra

Sharad Sukhdeo Sonawane Vs State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Ratna Anil Tare Vs the State of Maharashtra