In this anticipatory bail application, the applicant sought unconditional withdrawal of the petition before the order was passed. The court granted permission for the withdrawal and disposed of the application accordingly.
Permission granted for unconditional withdrawal of the anticipatory bail application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
04-ABA-153-22.odt
1 / 1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.153 OF 2022
Piyush Parag.... Applicant
versus
State of Maharashtra & Anr..... Respondents
Mr.Sanjiv Punalekar i/b. Ameya Kadkade, Advocate for Applicant.Mr.P. H. Gaikwad, APP for the State/Respondent.CORAM: SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.
DATE: 03rd FEBRUARY, 2022
(through video conferencing)
P.C. :
1. After arguing for some time, when I expressed my
disinclination to grant relief in this application, learned counselfor the Applicant prays for unconditional withdrawal of this
application.
Digitally signed by MANUSHREE MANUSHREE V V NESARIKAR NESARIKAR Date: 2022.02.04 11:16:44 +0530
2. Permission granted. Application is allowed to be
withdrawn unconditionally and is disposed of as such.
(SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.)
Nesarikar
Piyush Parag
State of Maharashtra & Anr
SARANG V. KOTWAL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court