Petition disposed of as infructuous upon the petitioner's counsel representing that the case has become infructuous.
The petition was disposed of as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
31 WPCR-32-2020.DOC
Meena
IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.32 OF 2020
AMIR ALI BIRIYA …Petitioner Versus
STATE OF GOA, THR. THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR AND ANR.
…Respondents
Mr. Sanket Kamat, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Mahesh Amonkar, Additional Public Prosecutor for the respondent – State.
CORAM: MANISH PITALE, J DATED: 13th October,2021
P.C.
1. The learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the present petition has been rendered infructuous and that it may be disposed of as such.
2. Hence, the Petition is disposed of as infructuous.
MEENA VISHAL BHOIR Digitally signed by MEENA VISHAL BHOIR Date: 2021.10.14 15:46:33 +05'30'
MANISH PITALE, J.
Page 1 of 1 13th October, 2021
Amir Ali Biriya
State of Goa, thr. The Public Prosecutor and Anr.
Manish Pitale
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
