Disposed

Nimesh Munshi, Presently in Judicial Custody at Colvale Jail, Colvale, Thr. Rajesh Shirodkar v. State of Goa, Thr. the Office of the Public Prosecutor and Anr.

Bombay HC13 Oct 2021CRMAM/4/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Applications for modification of bail conditions and investment of deposited amount were disposed of as infructuous due to liberty granted. Remaining issue regarding investment was accepted.

What did the court decide?

Applications disposed of as infructuous; amounts deposited permitted to be invested appropriately during pendency.

Nimesh Munshi, Presently in Judicial Custody at Colvale Jail… — Bail and Remand | Bombay HC (2021)

¶1

(17)(18) CRMAM 3,4 2021

¶2

Aura

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY

¶4

Criminal Application (Main) No.3 of 2021

¶5

With

¶6

Criminal Application (Main) No.4 of 2021

¶7

NIMESH MUNSHI, PRESENTLY IN JUDICIAL CUSTODY AT COLVALE JAIL, COLVALE, THR. RAJESH SHIRODKAR

¶8

APPLICANTS

¶9

Versus

¶10

STATE OF GOA, THR. THE OFFICE OF THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR AND ANR

¶11

RESPONDENTS

¶12

Mr. V. P. Thali, Advocate for the Applicants Mr. S. G. Bhobe , Public Prosecutor for the Respondent no.1State

¶13

Mr. A. D. Bhobe with Ms. Annelise Fernandes, Advocates for the Respondent no.2

¶14

CORAM: MANISH PITALE, J DATED: 13^th October, 2021

¶15

P.C.:

¶16

1. The learned counsel appearing for the applicants in these

¶17

two applications informs that pursuant to the Order dated
16/9/2021 and the liberty granted by this Court, the applicant

¶18

Page 1 of 2

¶19

13th Oct..2021

¶20

(17)(18) CRMAM 3,4 2021

¶21

had applied before the Sessions Court for modification of the
condition imposed while granting bail. It is informed that the
condition has to be suitably modified and, therefore, the present
applications have been rendered infructuous.

¶22

2. The learned counsel for the applicant further informs that the amounts of Rs.2.00 lakhs each, deposited before the Magistrate may be permitted to be invested appropriately, so that the interest accrued on the said amounts may inure to the benefit of the party, in whose favour the proceedings may be terminated.

¶23

3. The statement appears to be reasonable, to which the learned Public Prosecutor and the learned counsel appearing for the private respondent have no objection.

¶24

4. Accordingly, the applications are disposed of. The amounts already deposited before the Magistrate shall be invested in appropriate manner during the pendency of the present proceedings before the Magistrate.

¶25

MANISH PITALE, J.

¶26

MARIA Digitally signed by MARIA AURA AURA PEREIRA Date: 2021.10.14 PEREIRA 09:57:01 +05'30'

¶27

Page 2 of 2 13th Oct..2021

Nimesh Munshi, Presently in Judicial Custody at Colvale Jail, Colvale, Thr. Rajesh Shirodkar v. State of Goa, Thr. the Office of the Public Prosecutor and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Nimesh Munshi, Presently in Judicial Custody at Colvale Jail, Colvale, Thr. Rajesh Shirodkar v. State of Goa, Thr. the Office of the Public Prosecutor and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Helen Fernandes., Vs Leeroux Fernandes and 2 Ors.

The Bicholim Urban Co-Operative Bank Ltd., Rep. by Its Managing Director, Vithal G. P. Desai., Vs the Goa State Co-Operative Bank Ltd.

Rukmini Shantaram Petkar, Thr. Poa, Navnath Shantaram Petkar Vs Sadguru Ramchandra Petkar and 11 Ors.

Amir Ali Biriya., Vs State of Goa, Thr. the Public Prosecutro and Anr.

Kishore K. Keswani Vs Aniksha Jaisinghani and 2 Ors.

Nimesh Munshi, Presently in Judicial Custody at Colvale Jail, Colvale, Thr. Rajesh Shirodkar Vs State of Goa, Thr. the Office of the Public Prosecutor and Anr.