Partly allowed
Kiran Murlidhar Patil v. the State of Maharashtra Thr Its Principal Secretary and Others
Bombay HCWP/994/2021
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
The High Court of Bombay quashed orders denying_shikshan_sevak_ra_rank_to_petitioners_based_exclusively_on_aided_post_service_duration_Recognizing_that_unaided_ _post_service_must_ _be_counted_ _towards_qualification _,_the_ _court_directed_ _that_approvals_be_granted_considering_total_service_rendered_on_both_unaided_and_aided_posts.
What did the court decide?
Impugned orders granting approval as Shikshan Sevaks from the date of transfers on aided posts quashed; officers directed to consider services on unaided posts while granting approvals.