Petitioner challenged prolonged pending of appeal before School Tribunal. Court directed respondent to decide merit within three months and disposed of Writ Petition.
Respondent No.2 directed to decide pending appeal within three months; Writ Petition disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
27 wp 766-21.odt
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
27 WRIT PETITION NO.766 OF 2021
AHEMADI SIDDIQUI ABDUL MAJID VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
Advocate for Petitioner : Mr. Anil Kasliwal Jain AGP for Respondent No.1: Mrs. P.V. Diggikar
CORAM : S. V. GANGAPURWALA &
SHRIKANT D. KULKARNI, JJ. DATED : 18th JANUARY , 2021.
PER COURT :
the petitioner before the School Tribunal, Latur is pending since
2 27 wp 766-21.odt
the year, 2015, respondent No.2 shall decide the said appeal on its own merits in accordance with the law after hearing all parties concerned expeditiously, preferably within three (03) months.
(SHRIKANT D. KULKARNI, J.)
(S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J.)
vsm/-
1 issue framed by the court
Whether respondent No.2 shall decide the pending appeal on its own merits expeditiously within three months.
AHEMADI SIDDIQUI ABDUL MAJID
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
S. V. GANGAPURWALA
SHRIKANT D. KULKARNI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
