Panjabrao Shrihari Wadje v. the State of Maharashtra and Others
Case brief
What is this about?
The writ petition was disposed of as withdrawn by the petitioner upon instructions. No substantive legal principle was discussed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
111-WP-969-2021.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
111 WRIT PETITION NO.969 OF 2021
PANJABRAO SHRIHARI WADJE
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
...
Advocate for Petitioner : Mr. P. G. Godhamgaonkar h/f Mr. Ghute Patil
Kishor J.
GP for Respondents/State: Mr. D. R. Kale
CORAM : S. V. GANGAPURWALA &
SHRIKANT D. KULKARNI, JJ.
DATE : 08.02.2021
P.C. :
. Learned counsel for the petitioner, on instructions,
submits that the petition has become infructuous and seeks leave to
withdraw the writ petition. The Writ Petition is disposed of as
withdrawn.
(SHRIKANT D. KULKARNI, J.) (S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J.)
Sameer
Panjabrao Shrihари Wadje
The State of Maharashtra
S. V. Gangapurwala
Shrikant D. Kulkarni
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court