The writ petition stands dismissed as withdrawn. The petitioner is granted liberty to pray for expediting the hearing of the original application before the Tribunal.
Dismissal of writ petition as withdrawn; liberty to pray for expedition of original application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Diksha Rane
Digitally signed by DIKSHA DIKSHA DINESH DINESH RANE RANE Date: 2021.12.16 20:08:10 +0530
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 9000 OF 2021
Dr. Kaushik Girishchandra Rathod ..Petitioner vs.
The Honorable Administrator U.T. Administration of DNH & Daman & Diu & others ..Respondents
Mr. Rajeev N. Kumar a/w. Aditya Parmar for petitioner. Mr. H.S. Venegaonkar for respondent.
CORAM : DIPANKAR DATTA, CJ &
M. S. KARNIK, J.
DATE : DECEMBER 15, 2021
P.C. :
(M. S. KARNIK, J.) (CHIEF JUSTICE)
1/1
Dr. Kaushik Girishchandra Rathod
The Honorable Administrator U.T. Administration of DNH & Daman & Diu
Dipankar Datta
M. S. Karnik
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
