Petitioner challenged an impugned show-cause notice. During hearing, respondents informed the court that the notice and associated order were withdrawn. Court found writ petition rendered infructuous.
Writ petition disposed of as infructuous; no costs awarded.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
24.wp.1860-21
PMB
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.1860 OF 2021
Jeena & Company
..Petitioner
vs.
Union of India and ors.
..Respondents
Mr. Anay Banhatti a/w Mr. Ranjeet Mahtani, Mr. Umang Motiyani for petitioner. Mr. Y.R. Mishra a/w Mr. Upendra Lokegaonkar, Mr. Shailendra Mishra for respondents.
CORAM : DIPANKAR DATTA, CJ & M. S. KARNIK, J.
DATE: DECEMBER 14, 2021
P.C. :
1
24.wp.1860-21
(M. S. KARNIK, J.)
(CHIEF JUSTICE)
Digitally signed by PRADNYA PRADNYA MAKARAND MAKARAND BHOGALE BHOGALE Date: 2021.12.15 17:15:44 +0530
2
Jeena & Company
Union of India
DIPANKAR DATTA
M. S. KARNIK
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
