The writ petition regarding reduced pension was disposed of when the respondent advocate stated no recovery proceedings would be initiated, leading the petitioner to withdraw the petition.
Writ petition disposed of with no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
901wp8260o18.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO.8260 OF 2018
BHAGWANRAO VENKANNA TUMMALWAR
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr.Deshmukh Avinash S. AGP for the Respondent Nos.1 to 4 : Mr.P.S. Patil Advocate for the Respondent No.5 : Shri B.A. Darak
CORAM : DIPANKAR DATTA, C.J.
&
RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J.
DATE :- 16th JUNE, 2021
PER COURT:-
(RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J.)
(CHIEF JUSTICE)
kps
Bhagwanrao Venkanna Tummalwar
The State of Maharashtra
Municipal Council
Dipankar Datta
Ravindra V. Ghuge
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
