The writ petition was disposed of as infructuous following a submission by the petitioner that the underlying dispute had been settled by subsequent events.
Petition disposed of as infructuous. No costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO.2949 OF 2017
MAHEMOOD SHAIKH SUBHAN VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
Mr.Subodh P.Shah, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr.P.M.Nagargoje h/f Mr.N.N.Desale, Advocate for respondent No.3. Mrs.M.A.Deshpande, AGP for State.
( CORAM : DIPANKAR DATTA, CJ AND RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J.)
DATE : JUNE 16, 2021
PER COURT :
holding that the same has been rendered infructuous by reason of subsequent events. No costs.
( RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J. ) ( CHIEF JUSTICE )
khs/Jun.2021/2949
Mehmood Shaikh Subhan
The State of Maharashtra
Dipankar Datta
Ravindra V. Ghuge
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
