This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
{1}
wp78716.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO.787 OF 2016
Raosaheb s/o Bhaguji Todmal
Petitioner
Versus
The Director of Marketing, Maharashtra State, Pune & others
Respondents
Mr. S. K. Shinde, advocate for the petitioner. Mr. R. V. Dasalkar, AGP for Respondents No.1 & 2. Mr.A. D. Ostwal, advocate for Respondent No.3.
CORAM : DIPANKAR DATTA, C.J. & S.S. SHINDE, J.
DATE : 27th August, 2021.
PC :
Mr. Shinde, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits
that by effuu of time, the writ petition has been rendered infructuous.
In view of such submission, the writ petition stands disposed of as infructuous. No costs.
JUDGE
CHIEF JUSTICE
adb
Raosaheb s/o Bhaguji Todmal
The Director of Marketing, Maharashtra State, Pune
Dipankar Datta
S.S. Shinde
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
