Petitioner challenged termination of a building material supply contract by Gram Panchayat. Court held that time-bound supply issues are disputed questions of fact requiring civil remedy, not writ jurisdiction.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
920-WP-747-21.odt
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR
Writ Petition No. 747 of 2021
Rajkiran s/o Shivram Barve
... Petitioner
Versus
Gram Panchayat Kawatha (Mahasala) Tah. Kamptee, Dist. Nagpur and another
... Respondents
Shri A. D. Dangore, Advocate for the Petitioner.
CORAM : NITIN JAMDAR AND ANIL S. KILOR, JJ. DATED : 05 FEBRUARY 2021
P.C. :
Heard the learned Counsel for the Petitioner.
Choulwar
2 920-WP-747-21.odt
Choulwar
3 920-WP-747-21.odt
Jurisdiction. The Petitioner has a remedy of enforcing its contractual rights, such as for damages etc., in the Civil Court.
of.
[ANIL S. KILOR, J.]
[NITIN JAMDAR, J.]
Digitally signed by Vithal Vithal Choulwar Choulwar Date: 2021.02.1610:11:07 +0530
Choulwar
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the termination of a supply contract by a Gram Panchayat due to alleged non-supply of material within the stipulated time can be adjudicated in a Writ jurisdiction.
Rajkiran s/o Shivram Barve
Gram Panchayat Kawatha (Mahasala)
Nitin Jamdar
Anil S. Kilor
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
