Agriculture Produce Marketing Committee, through Chairman, Shri Atul Gangadharao Ganyarpwar and 1 Vs State of Maharashtra, through Its Secretary, Co-Operation Marketing and Textile Department, Mumbai

Civil Application is filed for amendment of the writ petition to challenge the order dated 19 October 2020 whereby the extension to the elected body of the Petitioner - APMC has been refused. The Petition was filed by the Petitioner with a grievance that no decision is taken about continuation of the elected body of the Petitioners while extension has been granted to others.

¶12

Choulwar

¶13

2 20-CAW-148-21.odt

¶14

The Petition as filed does not disclose as to how it is using discrimination resulted in discrimination. Now, an order has been specifically passed refusing extension to the Petitioner. The challenge to such an order would stand at a different footing.

¶15

The learned Counsel for the Petitioner states that the challenge made in the amendment application is only a continuation of the cause. According to us, the amendment application challenges a different order and should be appropriately challenged in a substantive Petition. In case the Petitioner is interested in challenging the order dated 19 October 2020, all legal and factual grounds are kept open.

¶16

The Writ Petition and amendment applications are accordingly disposed of with liberty as above.

¶17

[ANIL S. KILOR, J.]

¶18

[NITIN JAMDAR, J.]

¶19

Digitally signed by Vithal Choulwar Date: 2021.02.04 18:36:14 +0530

¶20

Vithal Choulwar

¶21

Choulwar

Agriculture Produce Marketing Committee, through Chairman, Shri Atul Gangadharao Ganyarpwar and 1 v. State of Maharashtra, through Its Secretary, Co-Operation Marketing and Textile Department, Mumbai

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Agriculture Produce Marketing Committee, through Chairman, Shri Atul Gangadharao Ganyarpwar and 1 v. State of Maharashtra, through Its Secretary, Co-Operation Marketing and Textile Department, Mumbai

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Vaidyakiya Jan Jagruti Manch, Thr. President, Dr. Sachin Sureshreao Pawade Vs the State of Maharashtra, Thr. Secretary Deptt. of Medical Education and Drugs, Mumbai and Others

Kavita D/O Haridas Chavam (Kavita W/O Raju Dahake)) Vs State of Maha. Thr. Secretary, Food, Civil Supply and Consumer Protection Dept. Mumbai and Others

Smt. Bindu W/O. Ratnadip Bansod Vs the Zilla Parishad, Bhandara Thr. Chief Executive Officer, and Another

Sushikshit Berojgar Abhiyanta Sanghatna Association, Thr. President, Anand Ajitkumar Jain, Gondia Vs the State of Maharashtra, Thr. Secretary, Public Work Department, Mumbai and Others

Abhishek Shrihari Deogade Vs the Scheduled Tribe Certificate Scrutiny Committee, Nagpur through Member Secretary and Others

Suvarna Kawduji Raut Vs Scheduled Tribes Caste Certificate Scrutiny Committee, Amravati Thr. Member Secretary and Another