Disposed

Darasing Ramji Tagare v. Shri Vinayak Bahuuddeshiya Gramin Vikas Sanstha, through Secretary/President and Others

Bombay HC2 Mar 2021WP/7401/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner Assistant Teacher sought Writ Reliefs regarding non-grant of increments. Bench observed Project Officer was already seized of the matter and directed the Officer to ascertain the position and issue directions within eight weeks.

What did the court decide?

Direction to Respondent No.4 (Project Officer) to ascertain the petitioner's position and issue necessary directions within eight weeks.

Darasing Ramji Tagare Vs Shri Vinayak… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Bombay HC (2021)

¶1

947-wp-7401-2019.odt

¶2

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR

¶4

Writ Petition No.7401 of 2019

¶5

Darasing Ramji Tagare …Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

Shri Vinayak Bahuuddeshiya Gramin Vikas Sanstha and others

¶8

...Respondents

¶9

Ms. S.S. Deshputre, Advocate for the Petitioner Mrs. K. R. Deshpande, AGP for the Respondent Nos.2 and 4 - State Shri P.D. Randive, Advocate for Respondent No.1 and 3

¶10

CORAM : NITIN JAMDAR AND ANIL S. KILOR, JJ.

¶11

DATED : 2 MARCH 2021

¶12

P.C.:

¶13

Heard learned Counsel for the parties.

¶14

The Petitioner is appointed as Assistant Teacher at the Respondent No.3 – School which is run by the Respondent No.1 – Management.

¶15

The Petitioner’s grievance is that the Petitioner has not been granted increments between the period of 1 July 2011 to 1 July 2019 with arrears and that the Respondent No.1 – Management is not complying with the order passed by the Respondent No.4 – Project Officer, Pusad.

¶16

nd.thawre

¶17

2 947-wp-7401-2019.odt

¶18

The Respondent No.4 – Project Officer has issued certain directions to the Respondent No.1 – Management on 5 July 2016 in respect of the pay fixation of the Petitioner and has called for certain queries after examining the record. Nothing is placed on record as to what further steps have been taken by the Respondent No.4– Project Officer. Though the Petition is filed in the year 2019, reply also has not been filed on behalf of the Respondent No.4 - Project Officer.

¶19

Once the Respondent No.4 – Project Officer has already looked into the grievance of the Petitioner and has called for information from the Respondent No.1 – Management, the Respondent No.4 should take the matter further to it’s logical end. Since the Respondent No.4 is already seized of the matter, it is not necessary for us to enter into the interse dispute.

¶20

We direct the Respondent No.4 – Project Officer to ascertain the position pursuant to the communication dated 5 July 2016 and after examining the record and as per law, issue necessary direction within a period of eight weeks from today. The result be communicated to the Petitioner and the Respondent No.1 – Management.

¶21

The Writ Petition is accordingly disposed of.

¶22

[ANIL S. KILOR, J.] [NITIN JAMDAR, J.]

¶23

nd.thawre

Darasing Ramji Tagare v. Shri Vinayak Bahuuddeshiya Gramin Vikas Sanstha, through Secretary/President and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Darasing Ramji Tagare v. Shri Vinayak Bahuuddeshiya Gramin Vikas Sanstha, through Secretary/President and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Pravin S/O Eknath Ghode Vs State Election Commission, Maharashtra, through Its Secretary, Mumbai and Others

Sadhana Wd/O Narendra Rangari Vs State of Maharashtra, through Secretary, School Education Department, Mumbai and Others

Union of India, through the Secretary, Ministry of Agriculture and Co-Operation, New Delhi and 2 Ot Vs Smt. Snehal Vijay Wanaskar W/O Shri Vijay Wanaskar

Dilip S/O Hiralala Tiwari Vs the State of Maharashtra through Secretry Home Department, Mumbai and Others

Shri Shivaji Education Society, Amravati Thr. Secretary, Amravati and Another Vs Maharashtra University of Health Sciences, Thr. Registrar, Nashik

M/S. Gouri Construction, Nagpur through Proprietor Mr. Shriniwas Chandraidu Pedhabuddi Vs State of Maharashtra, through Collector, Chandrapur and Others