Petitioners argued their no. 2 was no longer employed, warranting dismissal. The court kept legal questions open but disposed of the writ petition.
Writ Petition disposed of; questions of law kept open.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 / 1 01-WP 4494.17
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR
WRIT PETITION NO. 4494 OF 2017
Shri. Shivaji Education Society, Amravati and anr. -- Petitioners vs. Maharashtra University of Health Sciences, Nashik -- Respondent Mr. S. V. Purohit, Advocate for Petitioners. Mr. A. D. Deshpande, Advocate for Respondent.
CORAM : NITIN JAMDAR & ANIL S. KILOR, JJ.
DATE : 02 MARCH 2021
P. C. :
The learned counsel for the Petitioner states that the Petitioner No.1 – Society had filed a Writ Petition along with Petitioner No.2 in respect of relief which was primarily for Petitioner No.2 based on certain position of law. The learned counsel for the Petitioners submit that the Petitioner No.2 is no longer in the employment of Petitioner No.1 and therefore, the Petition need not be prosecuted any further.
KOLHE
Shri. Shivaji Education Society, Amravati and anr.
Maharashtra University of Health Sciences, Nashik
Nitin Jamdar
Anil S. Kilor
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
